Application Cache is not gone, oh my! Or, is it?

Reports of Application Cache’s early demise are false. Application Cache (a.k.a Cache Manifest and AppCache) isn’t perfect, it can be very frustrating to get working and many people hate it with passion, but the fact is that the API will be around for the foreseeable future. I’ve been getting many questions, so this blog post is an attempt to shed some light on a confusing topic.

Mozilla says Application Cache is deprecated and unstable, WTF?

First, let’s review what Mozilla is saying about Application Cache since the majority of questions I get come from what they are saying. Mozilla has some fairly strong wording on their developer site, you can read all about it here. Or, if you don’t feel like following a link, here’s the official text from Mozilla Developer Network (MDN) website. I added the underlines to emphasize wording that’s tripping people up:

Deprecated. This feature has been removed from the Web standards. Though some browsers may still support it, it is in the process of being dropped. Do not use it in old or new projects. Pages or Web apps using it may break at any time.

Using the application caching feature described here is at this point highly discouraged; it’s in the process of being removed from the Web platform. Use Service Workers instead. In fact, as of Firefox 44, when AppCache is used to provide offline support for a page a warning message is now displayed in the console advising developers to use Service workers instead (bug 1204581).

Mozilla also references the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group’s (WHATWG) position on Application Cache. But, their wording is similar but definitely different in meaning from the WHATWG statement in their HTML Living Standard, Section 7.7. You may want to read this several times:

This feature is in the process of being removed from the Web platform. (This is a long process that takes many years.) Using any of the offline Web application features at this time is highly discouraged. Use service workers instead.

An oversimplified description of the WHATWG is it’s an organization that provides research and makes recommendations to the W3C – World Wide Web Consortium. It’s the W3C that finalizes recommendations and makes them into standards.

Also note: Application Cache is, for the moment, still officially part of the latest draft of the WHATWG HTML Living Standard document as shown here in Section 7.2.2 (it’s a big document, it’s best to just search for application cache).


What is the true state of Service Workers?

Reality is always nuanced when it comes to cross-browser web application development. Here’s a summary of facts for cross-browser developers to consider (as of February 1, 2016):

  • Service Workers are NOT supported on the following platforms, and you’ll need to use Application Cache if it suits your requirements and any Application Cache bugs don’t adversely affect your apps. You can verify these on
    • Android Browsers at v4.4.4 and older (there are still a lot of phones out there using older browsers). Yes, a percentage of these users download Chrome. However, as of Feb 1, 2016, Android is reporting that v4.1.x thru v4.4 represents 60.8% of all phones in circulation.
    • Desktop Safari
    • iOS Safari
    • IE and Edge – don’t forget that a lot of offline field worker apps are built specifically for laptops.
  • The Service Worker specification is still a Working Draft according to the W3C. It’s not final according to the official standards bodies. Mozilla even lists Service Workers as “Experimental Technology”. You can view that yourself here. Here’s MDNs wording copied directly from their webpage:

This is an experimental technology 

Because this technology’s specification has not stabilized, check the compatibility table for the proper prefixes to use in various browsers. Also note that the syntax and behavior of an experimental technology is subject to change in future versions of browsers as the spec changes.

  • Service workers are more complex and require coding skills in comparison to Application Cache which requires only a configuration file and one line of HTML code. Here’s an example. It’s going to be a big step for long time Application Cache developers to wrap their heads around using Service Workers. It’s a very powerful API but it’s not going to be as easy as simply swapping out your Application Cache for offline capabilities built on Service Workers.

What to do, what to do?

My thoughts are MDNs statement leaves developers between a rock and a hard place, and holds the most water if the ONLY web browsers you need to support are browsers that have implemented all aspects of Service Workers that meet your requirements. You’ll also need to keep in mind that Service Workers are in beta so they can also can break or not work as expected, and there is a remote possibility the functionality could change.

When you combine MDN’s statement with the WHATWG statement and the WHATWG Living Standard document the picture becomes more clear. Here’s my interpretation: Application Cache is going to be around for a while longer. However, it would be a really good idea for you, as a cross-browser developer, to keep your eye on the progress of Service Workers and to consider using them in applications if/when it makes sense based on requirements and browser capabilities.

Don’t throw away an working/stable code built on Application Cache just yet.   If you are building apps on platforms that don’t support Service Workers then Application Cache may be your only viable alternative until you can upgrade to newer platforms or other browsers.

Additional References:

Offline JavaScript Part 2 – Overview of Interfaces and APIs

In Part 1 we looked at the differences between partial and fully offline use cases. Part 2 provides an overview of the HTML5 Interfaces and JavaScript APIs that make it possible to go offline with web applications. Going offline involves working with multiple pieces and coding for specific patterns. I’ve tried my best to stick to technology that is widely available across the largest variety of browsers.

Offline dependencies

Offline web applications are dependent on three things.  It doesn’t matter if your application is partially or fully offline, you’ll still need to address these in your code.

  • Caching HTML, CSS and JavaScript
  • Data Storage
  • Offline/Online detection


Application Cache. The Application Cache, or AppCache, interface lets you specify and store HTML and CSS files as well as JavaScript libraries so that they are available from the browser’s native cache. Once an item is in the cache the browser will use it regardless of whether it’s online or offline. It’s almost like you never went offline!

The AppCache is an essential part of your application strategy for allowing offline browser reloads or restarts. Without this an application will simply fail to re-load while offline.

Data Storage

Browsers have a variety built-in JavaScript APIs for storing data. The data can be for maintaining the applications state such as for storing bookmarks and form data. Or, it can be used for storing information such as maps, address and phone lists, TO-DOs or points of interest for a vacation.

LocalStorage. The LocalStorage API is super-easy to use. It stores Strings in simple key/value pairs. It’s limited to about 5MBs on most browsers. The two main challenges you’ll run into with LocalStorage are hitting the storage limit and performance hits when serializing and deserializing data.

IndexedDB. IndexedDB is essentially an asynchronous noSQL database that lets you store a wide variety of datatypes so that you don’t have to deal with serialization/deserialization.  Datatypes include String, Object, Array, Blob, ArrayBuffer, Uint8Array and File. While many online sources will tell you that there isn’t a size limit, I’ll tell you that in general you should limit your storage on a mobile device around 50 – 100MBs to help prevent the browser from crashing.

WebSql. It’s widely recommended that you not build applications directly on WebSql. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is letting this standard die off in favor of IndexedDB and LocalStorage. I’m really only including this here for reasons such as Safari 7 and and the Android native browsers before 4.4 only support WebSql. For more information on how to get around this read down to the section on IndexedDBShim.

3rd Party Browser Storage

If the built-in browser storage capabilities aren’t meeting your needs you still have other options.

IndexedDBShim. IndexedDBshim is a Polyfill for WebSQL-based browsers. Because IndexedDB isn’t natively supported on older versions Safari 7 and Opera you can use this 3rd party shim to transparently translate your IndexedDB code to work across Android and iOS.

PouchDB. PouchDB is an Open Source experimental library that is an attempt to smooth some of IndexedDB’s rough edges as well as provide additional functionality, such as the ability to sync with remote stores.

LocalForage (Mozilla).  LocalForage is also an attempt to bridge the gap between LocalStorage and IndexedDB. It gives you an interface that provides much wider browser coverage than IndexedDB by itself.  One of the downsides is the amount of storage you can use. If a user is on an older browser such as IE8 that’s limited to LocalStorage then that user will be limited to storing about 5MBs of data. If you requirements call for using more than that, such as downloading large address lists, then the app won’t work on that browser or you’ll have to build in some sort of paging mechanism that deletes the old data and brings in the new.

Offline/Online Detection

There are a number of ways to detect if the browser is online or offline as well as when the internet status changes.  Some browsers have a built-in detection mechanism. However, it is not always reliable and false positives are a distinct possibility. For that reason, you will have to build additional detection capabilities or lean towards a 3rd party library.

Offline.js. Offline.js is a small Open Source library (~3KB) that detects when you lose an internet connection and when it comes back up. While not perfect, it does handle a lot of cross-browser compatibility issues for you. And, if you find bugs you can always create a fix and submit pull requests.


Caniseuse – IndexedDB

Caniuse – LocalStorage

Caniuse – WebSQL

Let’s Take This Offline